LicenseTheData.comA field guide to business-data licensing
Home/Comparisons

Public evidence · 13 October 2026

Centific vs Mercor

Direct licensing meets direct licensing. Neither advertised amounts nor a public seller route establish what your business will receive.

Jump to the terms ledger ↓

Research comparison; limited public terms. Pair-level evidence and scenario review is pending. Published fields alone do not meet our indexing threshold. This page is noindex and absent from the sitemap, not a negative verdict.

The terms ledger.

Headquarters or contact location is not seller eligibility. Response, acceptance and payout stages are not interchangeable.

Published descriptions and unresolved contract terms
CriterionCentificMercor
Operating recordsPublished
CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses
Source ↗
Published
Slack, Gmail, Salesforce, GitHub, Notion, contracts, clinical notes and QA logs
Source ↗
Company eligibilityPublished
Operating, winding-down or closed companies. Intake includes Up to 50; no numerical minimum published.
Source ↗
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources: No numerical employee minimum published on inspected data page. Ask the provider; missing terms do not establish acceptance, free fees or a payment deadline. Inspection URLs remain in the profile source list.
Seller geographyUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Published compensationProvider claim
Written individually scoped estimate; employee annotation optional and priced separately.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Individually quoted; no public dollar rate card.
Source ↗
Fees & net proceedsPublished
No extraction/anonymization/transfer fees, setup costs or deductions.
Source ↗
Published
No upfront/setup fees or deductions; provider covers extraction, anonymization and transfer.
Source ↗
Timeline & payment triggerProvider claim
Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Wire upon delivery of anonymized dataset to buyer; typically 2–4 weeks from signed agreement.
Source ↗
Preparation & seller effortPublished
Estimate → scoped connections (188 applications) → extraction → anonymization → sample approval → acceptance; optional quarterly refresh.
Source ↗
Published
Scope → connect 100+ supported tools → extraction/de-identification → delivery/payment.
Source ↗
Ownership & permitted usePublished
License or, for some wind-downs, asset-purchase agreement; distinguish ownership sale from licensing.
Source ↗
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Privacy & approvalProvider claim
Scoped read-only, encrypted and logged processing; sample approval.
Source ↗
Provider claim
No data leaves until approval; encryption, access logs, session-isolated credentials; SOC 2 Type II claimed, audit not inspected.
Source ↗
ExclusivityUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Retention & deletionUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
HQ / published contactPublished
Redmond, WA, US; Suite 100 versus St.120 address discrepancy in official pages needs confirmation.
Source ↗
Published
San Francisco, CA named in program footer; US.
Source ↗

Operating records

CentificPublished
CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses
Source ↗
MercorPublished
Slack, Gmail, Salesforce, GitHub, Notion, contracts, clinical notes and QA logs
Source ↗

Company eligibility

CentificPublished
Operating, winding-down or closed companies. Intake includes Up to 50; no numerical minimum published.
Source ↗
MercorUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources: No numerical employee minimum published on inspected data page. Ask the provider; missing terms do not establish acceptance, free fees or a payment deadline. Inspection URLs remain in the profile source list.

Seller geography

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
MercorUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Published compensation

CentificProvider claim
Written individually scoped estimate; employee annotation optional and priced separately.
Source ↗
MercorProvider claim
Individually quoted; no public dollar rate card.
Source ↗

Fees & net proceeds

CentificPublished
No extraction/anonymization/transfer fees, setup costs or deductions.
Source ↗
MercorPublished
No upfront/setup fees or deductions; provider covers extraction, anonymization and transfer.
Source ↗

Timeline & payment trigger

CentificProvider claim
Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA.
Source ↗
MercorProvider claim
Wire upon delivery of anonymized dataset to buyer; typically 2–4 weeks from signed agreement.
Source ↗

Preparation & seller effort

CentificPublished
Estimate → scoped connections (188 applications) → extraction → anonymization → sample approval → acceptance; optional quarterly refresh.
Source ↗
MercorPublished
Scope → connect 100+ supported tools → extraction/de-identification → delivery/payment.
Source ↗

Ownership & permitted use

CentificPublished
License or, for some wind-downs, asset-purchase agreement; distinguish ownership sale from licensing.
Source ↗
MercorUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Privacy & approval

CentificProvider claim
Scoped read-only, encrypted and logged processing; sample approval.
Source ↗
MercorProvider claim
No data leaves until approval; encryption, access logs, session-isolated credentials; SOC 2 Type II claimed, audit not inspected.
Source ↗

Exclusivity

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
MercorUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Retention & deletion

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
MercorUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

HQ / published contact

CentificPublished
Redmond, WA, US; Suite 100 versus St.120 address discrepancy in official pages needs confirmation.
Source ↗
MercorPublished
San Francisco, CA named in program footer; US.
Source ↗

Which difference matters to your company?

Payment trigger

If cash timing matters, Mercor publishes wire on buyer delivery, typically 2–4 weeks after signing. Centific: Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA.

Centific: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Mercor: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Data fit

For your existing records, start with category fit: Centific lists CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses; Mercor lists Slack, Gmail, Salesforce, GitHub, Notion, contracts, clinical notes and QA logs. Ask each which subset has active demand before preparing exports.

Centific: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Mercor: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Shared diligence, not shared guarantees.

Both routes need lawful rights to the material. Removing names does not remove confidentiality obligations or re-identification risk. Require sample approval, buyer-use restrictions, precise payment triggers and downstream retention/deletion terms.

Seller-outcome evidence

Centific: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

Mercor: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

Put two routes side by side.

Choose two different providers. No income ranking.

Sources & unknowns.

Source claims were inspected on 13 October 2026. No intake was submitted or transaction tested. Unknowns are not zero fees, universal eligibility or unrestricted rights.

Read the evidence and indexing methodology →