LicenseTheData.comA field guide to business-data licensing
Home/Comparisons

Public evidence · 13 October 2026

Centific vs Replay

Direct licensing meets managed intermediary. Neither advertised amounts nor a public seller route establish what your business will receive.

Jump to the terms ledger ↓

Research comparison; limited public terms. Pair-level evidence and scenario review is pending. Published fields alone do not meet our indexing threshold. This page is noindex and absent from the sitemap, not a negative verdict.

The terms ledger.

Headquarters or contact location is not seller eligibility. Response, acceptance and payout stages are not interchangeable.

Published descriptions and unresolved contract terms
CriterionCentificReplay
Operating recordsPublished
CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses
Source ↗
Published
CRM, support, threads, code/commits, docs, financial records, presentations and product analytics
Source ↗
Company eligibilityPublished
Operating, winding-down or closed companies. Intake includes Up to 50; no numerical minimum published.
Source ↗
Published
Advertised employee bands: 20–50, 50–250, 250+. Not a verified hard minimum.
Source ↗
Seller geographyUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Published compensationProvider claim
Written individually scoped estimate; employee annotation optional and priced separately.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Advertised size bands: $10K–$100K, $100K–$1M, $1M+. USD context; typically upfront cash plus perpetual revenue share, percentage not published.
Source ↗
Fees & net proceedsPublished
No extraction/anonymization/transfer fees, setup costs or deductions.
Source ↗
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Timeline & payment triggerProvider claim
Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA.
Source ↗
Provider claim
120 minutes refers to seller effort, not payment speed; payout deadline not published.
Source ↗
Preparation & seller effortPublished
Estimate → scoped connections (188 applications) → extraction → anonymization → sample approval → acceptance; optional quarterly refresh.
Source ↗
Published
Value → offer → export/de-identify → payout.
Source ↗
Ownership & permitted usePublished
License or, for some wind-downs, asset-purchase agreement; distinguish ownership sale from licensing.
Source ↗
Published
Retains underlying data, code and IP; cleaned version licensed.
Source ↗
Privacy & approvalProvider claim
Scoped read-only, encrypted and logged processing; sample approval.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Deletion from Replay on request if not continuing; separate commercial agreement governs liability and downstream terms.
Source ↗
ExclusivityUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Retention & deletionUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
HQ / published contactPublished
Redmond, WA, US; Suite 100 versus St.120 address discrepancy in official pages needs confirmation.
Source ↗
Published
Delaware corporation; contact Brooklyn, NY, US. Not independently verified operational HQ.
Source ↗

Operating records

CentificPublished
CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses
Source ↗
ReplayPublished
CRM, support, threads, code/commits, docs, financial records, presentations and product analytics
Source ↗

Company eligibility

CentificPublished
Operating, winding-down or closed companies. Intake includes Up to 50; no numerical minimum published.
Source ↗
ReplayPublished
Advertised employee bands: 20–50, 50–250, 250+. Not a verified hard minimum.
Source ↗

Seller geography

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
ReplayUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Published compensation

CentificProvider claim
Written individually scoped estimate; employee annotation optional and priced separately.
Source ↗
ReplayProvider claim
Advertised size bands: $10K–$100K, $100K–$1M, $1M+. USD context; typically upfront cash plus perpetual revenue share, percentage not published.
Source ↗

Fees & net proceeds

CentificPublished
No extraction/anonymization/transfer fees, setup costs or deductions.
Source ↗
ReplayUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Timeline & payment trigger

CentificProvider claim
Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA.
Source ↗
ReplayProvider claim
120 minutes refers to seller effort, not payment speed; payout deadline not published.
Source ↗

Preparation & seller effort

CentificPublished
Estimate → scoped connections (188 applications) → extraction → anonymization → sample approval → acceptance; optional quarterly refresh.
Source ↗
ReplayPublished
Value → offer → export/de-identify → payout.
Source ↗

Ownership & permitted use

CentificPublished
License or, for some wind-downs, asset-purchase agreement; distinguish ownership sale from licensing.
Source ↗
ReplayPublished
Retains underlying data, code and IP; cleaned version licensed.
Source ↗

Privacy & approval

CentificProvider claim
Scoped read-only, encrypted and logged processing; sample approval.
Source ↗
ReplayProvider claim
Deletion from Replay on request if not continuing; separate commercial agreement governs liability and downstream terms.
Source ↗

Exclusivity

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
ReplayUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Retention & deletion

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
ReplayUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

HQ / published contact

CentificPublished
Redmond, WA, US; Suite 100 versus St.120 address discrepancy in official pages needs confirmation.
Source ↗
ReplayPublished
Delaware corporation; contact Brooklyn, NY, US. Not independently verified operational HQ.
Source ↗

Which difference matters to your company?

Data fit

For your existing records, start with category fit: Centific lists CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses; Replay lists CRM, support, threads, code/commits, docs, financial records, presentations and product analytics. Ask each which subset has active demand before preparing exports.

Centific: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Replay: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Payment trigger

Centific: Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA. Replay: 120 minutes refers to seller effort, not payment speed; payout deadline not published. These clocks measure different stages, not equivalent payout deadlines; ask for a written acceptance-to-payment interval.

Centific: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Replay: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Shared diligence, not shared guarantees.

Both routes need lawful rights to the material. Removing names does not remove confidentiality obligations or re-identification risk. Require sample approval, buyer-use restrictions, precise payment triggers and downstream retention/deletion terms.

Seller-outcome evidence

Centific: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

Replay: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

Put two routes side by side.

Choose two different providers. No income ranking.

Sources & unknowns.

Source claims were inspected on 13 October 2026. No intake was submitted or transaction tested. Unknowns are not zero fees, universal eligibility or unrestricted rights.

Read the evidence and indexing methodology →