LicenseTheData.comA field guide to business-data licensing
Home/Comparisons

Public evidence · 13 October 2026

Centific vs SimpleClosure AssetHub

Direct licensing meets asset sale / licensing. Neither advertised amounts nor a public seller route establish what your business will receive.

Jump to the terms ledger ↓

Research comparison; limited public terms. Pair-level evidence and scenario review is pending. Published fields alone do not meet our indexing threshold. This page is noindex and absent from the sitemap, not a negative verdict.

The terms ledger.

Headquarters or contact location is not seller eligibility. Response, acceptance and payout stages are not interchangeable.

Published descriptions and unresolved contract terms
CriterionCentificSimpleClosure AssetHub
Operating recordsPublished
CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses
Source ↗
Published
Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context
Source ↗
Company eligibilityPublished
Operating, winding-down or closed companies. Intake includes Up to 50; no numerical minimum published.
Source ↗
Published
Includes still-operating companies, per CEO; no public size minimum.
Source ↗
Seller geographyUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Published compensationProvider claim
Written individually scoped estimate; employee annotation optional and priced separately.
Source ↗
Provider claim
CEO reports tens-to-hundreds-of-thousands deals; enterprise potentially millions. Provider claims, not audited operating-data payouts.
Source ↗
Fees & net proceedsPublished
No extraction/anonymization/transfer fees, setup costs or deductions.
Source ↗
Published
No upfront cost; takes a percentage only on successful sale/license. Percentage not published.
Source ↗
Timeline & payment triggerProvider claim
Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline.
Source ↗
Preparation & seller effortPublished
Estimate → scoped connections (188 applications) → extraction → anonymization → sample approval → acceptance; optional quarterly refresh.
Source ↗
Published
Submit assets → viability assessment → buyer match → sale/license.
Source ↗
Ownership & permitted usePublished
License or, for some wind-downs, asset-purchase agreement; distinguish ownership sale from licensing.
Source ↗
Published
Retain assets through license or transfer them outright through sale, depending on deal.
Source ↗
Privacy & approvalProvider claim
Scoped read-only, encrypted and logged processing; sample approval.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Seller controls scope; sensitive data removed/de-identified before downstream licensing.
Source ↗
ExclusivityUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Retention & deletionUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
HQ / published contactPublished
Redmond, WA, US; Suite 100 versus St.120 address discrepancy in official pages needs confirmation.
Source ↗
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Operating records

CentificPublished
CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context
Source ↗

Company eligibility

CentificPublished
Operating, winding-down or closed companies. Intake includes Up to 50; no numerical minimum published.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Includes still-operating companies, per CEO; no public size minimum.
Source ↗

Seller geography

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Published compensation

CentificProvider claim
Written individually scoped estimate; employee annotation optional and priced separately.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubProvider claim
CEO reports tens-to-hundreds-of-thousands deals; enterprise potentially millions. Provider claims, not audited operating-data payouts.
Source ↗

Fees & net proceeds

CentificPublished
No extraction/anonymization/transfer fees, setup costs or deductions.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
No upfront cost; takes a percentage only on successful sale/license. Percentage not published.
Source ↗

Timeline & payment trigger

CentificProvider claim
Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubProvider claim
Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline.
Source ↗

Preparation & seller effort

CentificPublished
Estimate → scoped connections (188 applications) → extraction → anonymization → sample approval → acceptance; optional quarterly refresh.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Submit assets → viability assessment → buyer match → sale/license.
Source ↗

Ownership & permitted use

CentificPublished
License or, for some wind-downs, asset-purchase agreement; distinguish ownership sale from licensing.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Retain assets through license or transfer them outright through sale, depending on deal.
Source ↗

Privacy & approval

CentificProvider claim
Scoped read-only, encrypted and logged processing; sample approval.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubProvider claim
Seller controls scope; sensitive data removed/de-identified before downstream licensing.
Source ↗

Exclusivity

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Retention & deletion

CentificUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

HQ / published contact

CentificPublished
Redmond, WA, US; Suite 100 versus St.120 address discrepancy in official pages needs confirmation.
Source ↗
SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Which difference matters to your company?

Data fit

For your existing records, start with category fit: Centific lists CRM, contracts, projects, email, finance, healthcare operations, HR, ITSM and warehouses; SimpleClosure AssetHub lists Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context. Ask each which subset has active demand before preparing exports.

Centific: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ SimpleClosure AssetHub: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Payment trigger

Centific: Most partnerships reach first accepted contribution in 6–10 weeks; payment on acceptance. Acceptance estimate is not a payout SLA. SimpleClosure AssetHub: Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline. These clocks measure different stages, not equivalent payout deadlines; ask for a written acceptance-to-payment interval.

Centific: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ SimpleClosure AssetHub: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Shared diligence, not shared guarantees.

Both routes need lawful rights to the material. Removing names does not remove confidentiality obligations or re-identification risk. Require sample approval, buyer-use restrictions, precise payment triggers and downstream retention/deletion terms.

Seller-outcome evidence

Centific: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

SimpleClosure AssetHub: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

Put two routes side by side.

Choose two different providers. No income ranking.

Sources & unknowns.

Source claims were inspected on 13 October 2026. No intake was submitted or transaction tested. Unknowns are not zero fees, universal eligibility or unrestricted rights.

Read the evidence and indexing methodology →