Company size
For company-size screening, a 20–29 employee company falls below micro1’s published 30+ target. SimpleClosure AssetHub must be scoped against its own eligibility description; silence is not acceptance.
Direct licensing meets asset sale / licensing. Neither advertised amounts nor a public seller route establish what your business will receive.
Jump to the terms ledger ↓Research comparison; limited public terms. Pair-level evidence and scenario review is pending. Published fields alone do not meet our indexing threshold. This page is noindex and absent from the sitemap, not a negative verdict.
| Criterion | micro1 | SimpleClosure AssetHub |
|---|---|---|
| Operating records | Published SOPs, knowledge bases, CRM, projects, QA and internal processes Source ↗ | Published Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context Source ↗ |
| Company eligibility | Published 30+ employees; established documentation; English documents and representatives. Source ↗ | Published Includes still-operating companies, per CEO; no public size minimum. Source ↗ |
| Seller geography | Published US prioritized, then Western markets; strongest current demand US/UK/Canada. Global referrals do not mean global acceptance. Source ↗ | Unknown Not published / not established Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted. |
| Published compensation | Provider claim $100k+, $500k+, $1M+ advertised partnership tiers. USD context; period unspecified; individually evaluated, not guaranteed. Source ↗ | Provider claim CEO reports tens-to-hundreds-of-thousands deals; enterprise potentially millions. Provider claims, not audited operating-data payouts. Source ↗ |
| Fees & net proceeds | Unknown Not published / not established Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted. | Published No upfront cost; takes a percentage only on successful sale/license. Percentage not published. Source ↗ |
| Timeline & payment trigger | Unknown Not published / not established Not established in inspected sources: No quantified payment timeline published. Ask the provider; missing terms do not establish acceptance, free fees or a payment deadline. Inspection URLs remain in the profile source list. | Provider claim Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline. Source ↗ |
| Preparation & seller effort | Published Evaluation → discovery → agreed requirements → partnership. Source ↗ | Published Submit assets → viability assessment → buyer match → sale/license. Source ↗ |
| Ownership & permitted use | Published Retains underlying ownership; approvals and scope agreed before participation. Source ↗ | Published Retain assets through license or transfer them outright through sale, depending on deal. Source ↗ |
| Privacy & approval | Provider claim PII removed when relevant; samples reviewable; isolated processing and authorized access. Source ↗ | Provider claim Seller controls scope; sensitive data removed/de-identified before downstream licensing. Source ↗ |
| Exclusivity | Unknown Not published / not established Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted. | Unknown Not published / not established Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted. |
| Retention & deletion | Published Retention/deletion follow agreed terms; no public exact duration. Source ↗ | Unknown Not published / not established Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted. |
| HQ / published contact | Published Published privacy contact: San Francisco, US; operational HQ not independently established. Source ↗ | Unknown Not published / not established Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted. |
For company-size screening, a 20–29 employee company falls below micro1’s published 30+ target. SimpleClosure AssetHub must be scoped against its own eligibility description; silence is not acceptance.
For your existing records, start with category fit: micro1 lists SOPs, knowledge bases, CRM, projects, QA and internal processes; SimpleClosure AssetHub lists Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context. Ask each which subset has active demand before preparing exports.
micro1: Payment timing not established; ask the provider. SimpleClosure AssetHub: Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline. These clocks measure different stages, not equivalent payout deadlines; ask for a written acceptance-to-payment interval.
Both routes need lawful rights to the material. Removing names does not remove confidentiality obligations or re-identification risk. Require sample approval, buyer-use restrictions, precise payment triggers and downstream retention/deletion terms.
micro1: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.
SimpleClosure AssetHub: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.