LicenseTheData.comA field guide to business-data licensing
Home/Comparisons

Public evidence · 13 October 2026

SimpleClosure AssetHub vs Turing Project Lazarus

Asset sale / licensing meets direct licensing. Neither advertised amounts nor a public seller route establish what your business will receive.

Jump to the terms ledger ↓

Research comparison; limited public terms. Pair-level evidence and scenario review is pending. Published fields alone do not meet our indexing threshold. This page is noindex and absent from the sitemap, not a negative verdict.

The terms ledger.

Headquarters or contact location is not seller eligibility. Response, acceptance and payout stages are not interchangeable.

Published descriptions and unresolved contract terms
CriterionSimpleClosure AssetHubTuring Project Lazarus
Operating recordsPublished
Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context
Source ↗
Published
Communications, tickets, wikis, databases and code; code not required and not bought alone
Source ↗
Company eligibilityPublished
Includes still-operating companies, per CEO; no public size minimum.
Source ↗
Published
Any company with real operating history and an authorized representative; operating, winding-down or closed.
Source ↗
Seller geographyUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Published
Most regions; strongest demand US/UK/Canada/EU; export restrictions apply.
Source ↗
Published compensationProvider claim
CEO reports tens-to-hundreds-of-thousands deals; enterprise potentially millions. Provider claims, not audited operating-data payouts.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Single payout up to $1M; USD context; not recurring royalties or a guaranteed offer.
Source ↗
Fees & net proceedsPublished
No upfront cost; takes a percentage only on successful sale/license. Percentage not published.
Source ↗
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Timeline & payment triggerProvider claim
Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Intake call within one business day; valuation usually within a week of access. Neither is a payout deadline.
Source ↗
Preparation & seller effortPublished
Submit assets → viability assessment → buyer match → sale/license.
Source ↗
Published
NDA → intake → representative sampling/valuation → one contract.
Source ↗
Ownership & permitted usePublished
Retain assets through license or transfer them outright through sale, depending on deal.
Source ↗
Published
Retains underlying ownership; defined rights to prepared record.
Source ↗
Privacy & approvalProvider claim
Seller controls scope; sensitive data removed/de-identified before downstream licensing.
Source ↗
Provider claim
Named team, scoped access, air-gapped processing; personal data/secrets removed before model use. SOC 2 Type II claimed.
Source ↗
ExclusivityUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Retention & deletionUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
HQ / published contactUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Unknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Operating records

SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusPublished
Communications, tickets, wikis, databases and code; code not required and not bought alone
Source ↗

Company eligibility

SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Includes still-operating companies, per CEO; no public size minimum.
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusPublished
Any company with real operating history and an authorized representative; operating, winding-down or closed.
Source ↗

Seller geography

SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Turing Project LazarusPublished
Most regions; strongest demand US/UK/Canada/EU; export restrictions apply.
Source ↗

Published compensation

SimpleClosure AssetHubProvider claim
CEO reports tens-to-hundreds-of-thousands deals; enterprise potentially millions. Provider claims, not audited operating-data payouts.
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusProvider claim
Single payout up to $1M; USD context; not recurring royalties or a guaranteed offer.
Source ↗

Fees & net proceeds

SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
No upfront cost; takes a percentage only on successful sale/license. Percentage not published.
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Timeline & payment trigger

SimpleClosure AssetHubProvider claim
Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline.
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusProvider claim
Intake call within one business day; valuation usually within a week of access. Neither is a payout deadline.
Source ↗

Preparation & seller effort

SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Submit assets → viability assessment → buyer match → sale/license.
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusPublished
NDA → intake → representative sampling/valuation → one contract.
Source ↗

Ownership & permitted use

SimpleClosure AssetHubPublished
Retain assets through license or transfer them outright through sale, depending on deal.
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusPublished
Retains underlying ownership; defined rights to prepared record.
Source ↗

Privacy & approval

SimpleClosure AssetHubProvider claim
Seller controls scope; sensitive data removed/de-identified before downstream licensing.
Source ↗
Turing Project LazarusProvider claim
Named team, scoped access, air-gapped processing; personal data/secrets removed before model use. SOC 2 Type II claimed.
Source ↗

Exclusivity

SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Turing Project LazarusUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Retention & deletion

SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Turing Project LazarusUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

HQ / published contact

SimpleClosure AssetHubUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.
Turing Project LazarusUnknown
Not published / not established
Not established in inspected sources. Ask for the actual agreement; unknown does not mean free, unrestricted or accepted.

Which difference matters to your company?

Data fit

For your existing records, start with category fit: SimpleClosure AssetHub lists Startup workspace/code assets: Slack, email, Drive, Notion, Figma and project context; Turing Project Lazarus lists Communications, tickets, wikis, databases and code; code not required and not bought alone. Ask each which subset has active demand before preparing exports.

SimpleClosure AssetHub: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Turing Project Lazarus: source 1 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Payment trigger

SimpleClosure AssetHub: Assessment often hours/days; not a payment deadline. Turing Project Lazarus: Intake call within one business day; valuation usually within a week of access. Neither is a payout deadline. These clocks measure different stages, not equivalent payout deadlines; ask for a written acceptance-to-payment interval.

SimpleClosure AssetHub: source 1 ↗ source 2 ↗ source 3 ↗ Turing Project Lazarus: source 1 ↗ Public descriptions, not tested seller outcomes.

Shared diligence, not shared guarantees.

Both routes need lawful rights to the material. Removing names does not remove confidentiality obligations or re-identification risk. Require sample approval, buyer-use restrictions, precise payment triggers and downstream retention/deletion terms.

Seller-outcome evidence

SimpleClosure AssetHub: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

Turing Project Lazarus: No independently audited operating-business payout established in this research. Provider cases and partnership confirmations do not establish a typical seller outcome.

Put two routes side by side.

Choose two different providers. No income ranking.

Sources & unknowns.

Source claims were inspected on 13 October 2026. No intake was submitted or transaction tested. Unknowns are not zero fees, universal eligibility or unrestricted rights.

Read the evidence and indexing methodology →